{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/24/2016 2:22:37 PM
2
Then you're nerfing it to shit and didn't take into account my actually good idea. If a grenade doesn't "turn people one shot" (stupid phrase) it's useless.
English
-
Look at my second idea cause that would majeur look more like the incendiary
-
Yes, but then landing a grenade on a target/group would have to result in a kill, which is not factored in. An incendiary within close proximity lands a kill/multi depending on how close it is. Results in a one shot just outside of that.
-
But the impact of the incendiary also gets a drop off which the firebolt wouldn't
-
You even said the burn, AKA the damage is less the further away from the blast. It's the same concept, but with a different area falling off. That's why I said in that event, a landed nade would need to be a OHK.
-
An incendiary grenade for example takes skill to land and kill or turn oneshot while firebolt doen't take skill
-
Weird, because their both the exact same concept and blast radius.... except an incendiary can kill you with a burn . It's just the burn is less effective and the blast radius is more of a factor. And on most maps if you get firebolted it's your own fault. Easily avoided if you see them coming as with...everything ever....
-
No just no
