{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/19/2015 6:12:35 AM
7
I love how people don't take into account metacritics score. It's not like they pick a number, it's an average score of all the reviews they've seen.
User reviews on the other hand are completely biased, and a lot of them are trolls that just give games a 0 because they can.
Battlefront may not be a spectacular game, but it's not doing bad. Mediocrity is better than a "flop". It just didn't meet many players expectations. It is by no means a flop, but I knew it wasn't going to be that great. It's still enjoyable, just not something you'll play for long.[spoiler]I have EA access, so I'll just wait until it hits the vault.[/spoiler]
English
-
When a game scores under 80 on metacritic it's not worth paying full price. Believe me I've bought mediocre games in the past and was left disappointed.
-
On metacritic? No. Metacritic is even worse than Angry Joe or IGN. You will not have a fun time if you just base your opinion on metacritic. And under 80% is not a waste of money. When a game gets under 50% then it's not worth it And have you even played it?
-
Yeah played the beta, know it's not worth full price. Everyone has said the game lacks content...
-
Does that mean it's not fun? No. It can last you hours. And the beta only had two gameodes. That's it. And they fixed the balancing issue with the imperials
-
I expect more than a few hours worth of content for a full price game. The game is also an unbalanced mess on later levels with explosion spam...
-
I hated the beta but I love the game.
-
You realize battlefront is a casual game? It's not like F4 where you would spend day and night playing it.
