As a halo lore person this will be a rant (just finished today (yhea yhea, I lagged on mp and was playing legendary) 1. They make forerunner ruling structure as evil. While it may not be the best for humans (you know individualism and all that) it's still a decent system and didn't seem as evil in the books (or atleast this was never mentioned in books) 2. AIs access to the domain? Something about that seems odd... I wouldn't think they would even be able to 3. How dare they compare Locke to the accident humans. That's like, no. Ancient humans should have been much more advanced and shouldn't even be compared yet. 4. I remember in [i]the flood[/i] 343 suggested upgrading to a much stronger "combat skin" yet in halo 5 same defense as original halo. This is why I can't see them being compared to ancient humans (tenacity yea ) but they shouldn't be able to touch a warden 5. The existence of guardians seems totally wrong. If the forerunners had said weapons, why did the Sam' shum (spelling idk) rebellion get quelled by builder security? Couldn't they have used guardians? 6. How does a guardian even prevent crime? If one creature does one thing bad the whole planet is punished? Seems a bit ineffective and crude for a forerunner construct. 7. When cortana addressed all the races, one was mentioned that I never heard... Is that in that recent halo book? That last one is the only one I've missed so far