{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/4/2015 1:43:19 AM
1
If a Hindu works as a head chef in a restaurant that serves mainly chicken but then switches to lots of beef after he joins then should the restaurant be allowed to fire him for not doing his job and not serving beef because of his religion?
[spoiler]By "acts" I meant intercourse.[/spoiler]
English
-
Edited by Lord Sicarius: 9/4/2015 12:10:04 PMBut that's the difference. In Christianity, anything that has to do with the concept of homosexuality is wrong. Hindus simply cannot partake of any kind of beef.
-
Here's the similarities: the Christian clerk isn't doing her job because she disagrees with an aspect of it, the Hindu isn't doing his job because he disagrees with an aspect of it. It gets worse for the clerk, though. While the Hindu simply won't touch the beef because he thinks cows are sacred, the Christian clerk is purposefully and willingly discriminating against people based on sexual orientation. Discrimination is a crime, especially when done in a government office. The clerk both isn't doing her job but also committing a crime. Isn't that enough grounds to try to impeach her?
