{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Zargon:
7/17/2015 11:14:20 AM
212
Won't the Gjally nerf backfire?
Now with Gjally's wolfpack rounds getting nerfed and its effectivity reduced. I've thought about something: won't most people want even more people with a gjally after the nerf? Before, few people would accept others without it because they already had enough firepower to deal with the objective.
After the nerf have been applied, I believe the it will only promote even more elitism amongst the already toxicated player base. Everytime I visit the LFG forums a lot of the post contain a "must have gjally" requirement.
By nerfing the wolfpack rounds, people will feel the need to only accept gjallys to accumulate for the nerf introduced, thus resulting a backfire to this nerf's original intent. To eliminate exclusivity.
Any thoughts?
Edit 1: To admit, I've never owned a Gjally before and I've played since day one. I have already had much trouble trying to get into a raid or PoE team.
Edit 2: Better formulated the op.
-
I have had Gally since my first nightfall, 2 weeks in. And I have never knocked a player back for the guns they have. There was only ever a problem if they were rood, or just wouldn't listen. As the game moved on and the number of players with Gally increased I felt somewhat free of it so I could use other guns. So that said don't misunderstand me, it is not a crutch for me, I don't need it to accomplish an objective. But I really feel like they should have gone the other way, and offered an incentive to help players without the weapon. No, I don't know what a fair incentive would be. (A boon to RNG to increase chance of good drops?). But at the very least no one would be feeling like they're being punished for the actions of others.
