{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/10/2015 5:55:19 AM
1
[quote]Right, your spreading ignorance; I'm answering it with information.[/quote]Hmm...Britton calling paragraphs of information ignorance. Now I've seen everything.
English
-
There's no information in the paragraphs.
-
[quote]There's no information in the paragraphs.[/quote]I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or if you're acting dumb on purpose.
-
Nope dead serious. Literally nothing, not a single thing, about your OP is based in reality, isn't misinformation or misrepresentation, or is informative. Literally nothing.
-
Wow. It looks like you have lost an interest in Christian related science. Correct?
-
No such thing as Christian related science. You cannot do science from an unsubstantiated assumption.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 3:44:22 PM[quote]You cannot do science from an unsubstantiated assumption.[/quote]Yet the atheist believes the Big Bang happened. Yippee for reading.
-
False assumption is false.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 3:44:55 PM[quote]False assumption is false.[/quote]Haha. Britton says I'm false without a reason. It's no wonder he was only able to develop four words for an attempt to be intimidating. *slow clap* Also:[spoiler]You don't believe in the Big Bang?[/spoiler]
-
You never asked my opinion on the matter of the big bang. You simply assumed incorrectly. Do you really think your terrible attempts at attacking my character will somehow invalidate any of the information I've shared in this forum? Because it won't.
-
You don't believe in the Big Bang?
-
Science doesn't require belief. I simoky observe discoveries as they occur, and adjust my world view accordingly.
-
Okay...? Do you consider the Big Bang to be under evidential truth?
-
No. I consider it to be something we are constantly learning more about.
-
...but it apparently doesn't feel that the scientists are getting anywhere with it except for the fact that they feel as if they should restate the origin repetitively: An atheistic scientist states, "In the beginning, a light exploded from nothing supernatural acting as the cause to which we have not yet any logical explanation, but we can assure the public that we are doing our daily head scratches to try our best to find out how the heck did we get here." *ends the "news" press conference*
-
Actually new discoveries are made all the time. If the reason for everything was "god did it" there would be no reason to even look for more answers. It doesn't matter that the fact we don't have a definite explanation for everything bothers you. That doesn't constitute or lend credit to religious or supernatural answers.
-
[quote]No such thing as Christian related science.[/quote]Now your losing your English skills.
-
Edited by Britton: 6/10/2015 6:54:39 AMThere is only science. Christians can relate to it or not, the science doesn't change according to your beliefs. At this point literally every one of your replies to me is becoming a personal attack. I assume you no longer have an argument.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/10/2015 4:00:49 PM[quote]There is only science. Christians can relate to it or not, the science doesn't change according to your beliefs.[/quote]Agreed; however, the science that obviously is evidential doesn't conflict with our beliefs; hence, the OP's title.[quote]At this point, literally every one of your replies to me is becoming a personal attack. I assume you no longer have an argument.[/quote]You attacked me regarding Science, which you diverted off of later; the subject of English, which you apparently assumed to be wrong in those cases; and in the Bible, which you admittedly know not enough about to refute the theology. Remember when you stated to me in this same line of replies, "I'm merely insulting your intellect"? Not only have you done it before, but you have done it multiple times to not just me but to also others. All I'm doing is applying your methods. If you can't take it, don't dish it on others.
-
Edited by Britton: 6/10/2015 4:01:00 PMI attacked you regarding science because your portraying pseudo science as science. I attacked your language skills because you either on purpose or unknowingly misinterpret everything when having an argument. I know enough of the bible to understand its flaws. Your op is evident of nothing but ignorance.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/11/2015 3:54:32 AMYou're admitting to the fact that you attempted to attack me? Of course I believe all that you just stated is false since I already provided you and everyone else with the evidence against some of evolution, but still... Your objectiveness is very interesting to say the least.
-
Of course I did. I attack misinformation without mercy or remorse. Your entire OP is misinformation being paraded as evidence.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 6/11/2015 2:54:50 AMAs do I, but I include mercy and love to those that actually seek and to those that are misinformed when they proceed to possess an open mentality as all true Christians are commanded to do.
