Here's how life likely began. In the primordial oceans, little amino acid molecules were drifting around. Whenever UV radiation energised the molecules, some stuck together. Most conglomerations were useless. A rare few could self-replicate. These were the first life forms. As they replicated, they occasionally obtained or lost base pairs. This is how information was introduced. Most was noise. Most of the rest did nothing or tore the molecule apart. A rare few added helpful traits. Thus, no need for design. And given the sheer number of molecules on Earth, helpful mutations happened quite often. Try to refute me. And no biblical citations either.
English
-
[quote]Try to refute me. And no biblical citations either.[/quote] I love how people like you say things like this. What if I told you you couldn't use any evolutionist material as reference? That'd be unfair wouldnt it? Well here, enjoy a mute.
-
Edited by Kilo Bacón: 5/22/2015 3:33:49 PMBecause the biblical citations are part of a book that essentially says,"God is the one true god, and everything in this book is true because it says so in this book." It can't change. That story remains the same no matter what is discovered, whereas theories like evolution are subject to change as more evidence is found, and if enough evidence is found to support the contrary, the theory would be thrown out the window. It isn't about unfair, it is about evidence (that is more than just a book proclaiming itself to be true) to back up a claim
-
There's a difference between established science and grand statements made by some ignorant nomads 2500 years ago. Which one has a solid foundation and actual evidence? Hint: it's not the ramblings of hallucinating desert dwellers.